Today's Panelists: David Grainger, Chris Willenken, David Weiss, Len Vishnevsky, Fred Curtis, Ed Davis, Bobby Bodenheimer, Adam Wildavsky, Dave Caprera, Kent Hartman
You | LHO | CHO | RHO |
| Pass | ||
Dbl | Pass | ||
? |
Whoops, when submitting the problem, I had
I'm not a big believer in so-called insurance; all too often the premium is high. Especially in a short match, I try to be right when I back my (partnership) judgment.
Using that style (which is not mainstream) [It isn't? I thought it was pretty standard these days. --Jeff], a pass seems indicated as we are likely to hold 2 diamond losers off the top while we may even get a club ruff.
I thought that the
LHO's
Now, as to strain in the methods, if the
Chris thinks partner's hand isn't nearly pure enough for his initial fit bid. I agreetoo much defense.
|
Folks argue about whether we are in a force here and what double means. I think we are in a force. They appear to be saving. So while fit bids usually do not create a force, and in competitive auctions, jumps to game don't either (cue bid to set a force), I think think this one fits the "if they are obviously saving" rule. If LHO is "obviously saving" with 11 diamonds, oh well. If we are in a force, double doesn't show convertible values, but a defensive hand in context.
J108 Q1063 Q1054 AQ | ||
AQ952 KJ52 982 4 | ||
CHO | Dummy | You | Declarer |
Pass | Pass | ||
Pass | Pass | ||
Dbl | Pass | ? | |
Yes, they always seem to bid like this.
a) Do you pass or bid?
You lead 4th best and use upside-down carding.
b) Let's say you pass.
Partner leads the
Partner's heart lead looks like a singleton but does that really make sense? As a passed hand did he have fit-showing bids available? [This partner doesn't know them, so no. --Jeff]
You want to duck this as it makes no sense to believe he underled the
Surely CHO does not lead from an unbid 3-card holding here (which is about the only time it is mandatory to cover).
Hope I have put my cards down and had a long think on seeing dummy as is of course standard for 3rd hand!
|
J93 105 A1076 KQ52 | ||
Q62 A76 543 10943 | ||
CHO | Dummy | You | Declarer | |
Pass | Pass | 1NT (15-17) | ||
Pass | 3NT | All Pass | ||
OK, they don't always bid at the 5-level.
You lead 4th best and use upside-down carding.
Partner leads the
|
Ought declarer play the 9 when he has Kx or 10x? I don't know. On one hand, playing the 9 from all three holdings reveals the least information, so in theory, I think that's best. On the other hand, not playing the 9 increases your chances of scooping a trick with the 10. If a mixed strategy is best, it depends on how frequently 3rd hand will play the queen vs. a small card if you play the 9 vs. if you play small. That's such an unknown that it's hard to compute a mixed strategy.